On Fortune's Wheel
by Cynthia Voigt
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/390e7/390e7ae1f6a2677f43c814c6cfebdbcf16a48626" alt=""
I liked it. Abraham, on the other hand, read it and commented, "There was no plot. Also, why did all the men have 'hungry eyes'?" To each their own, I suppose.
Quentins
by Maeve Binchy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/096dc/096dcbca533550f8bfb76df1a8055d0725d45df9" alt=""
If Binchy had stuck to that premise, I think I would have enjoyed this book quite a bit. However, she kind of gets off on this tangent about this young single woman having an affair with an older married man, who is perfectly charming but ends up being a crook and having to leave the country with his wife and children. And the there's her suffering, blah, blah, blah. And then she hears that the man kills himself, blah, blah, blah. And then she goes to America, blah, blah, blah, and then I got bored and quit reading.
Good writing, typical quirky Binchy characters, but I just didn't find it that interesting. Could have just been my mood. Or maybe the story redeems itself at the end. But, after 400 pages, I just lost interest.
The River Why
by David James Duncan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa98e/aa98e224e71c4228891a93bd77b2a1a67608d21b" alt=""
I picked this up because it's on my sis-in-law Karen's list of most awesome books ever. And I positively adored the first quarter of this book, found it quite hilarious, and enjoyed the charmingly verbose, over-the-top writing style.
But then I got bored and quit reading.
Perhaps I am easily bored?
Reliquary
by Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38cc1/38cc156cfd2b3133a702ad85f131a71137b0f294" alt=""
Reliquary did not bore me. Reliquary, an anthropological/scientific mystery/thriller, was actually quite fascinating, on a couple of different levels.
The book opens in modern-day NewYork, in a mild state of crisis. Several people have been violently murdered and decapitated in a way that is frighteningly reminiscent of a series of murders that had occurred 18 months earlier in the city's Museum of Natural Science (described in the book Relic). The book follows the action as an FBI Agent, a couple of cops, a journalist, and a team of scientists try to figure out who-- or what--is responsible for the murders.
So the plot was interesting and engaging--but the thing I found most intriguing about this book was that the story explored the lives and culture of people who have given up life "above ground" and committed themselves to a different sort of life in darkness, living year-round in the abandoned subway tunnels and shafts in underground New York City.
Overall, an entertaining and interesting read. Plus, you have to love Agent Pendergast.
Skills Training Manual for Treating Borderline Personality Disorder
by Martha Linehan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/406dd/406ddafcf8ea2c6c6f67aa150a2070bfe3e94a2f" alt=""
I read this one for work (I manage the office at a mental health agency) and found it to be quite interesting. I'm a big fan of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and the hottest new variation in CBT is a treatment approach known as Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT).
Martha Linehan is a psychologist who found that the "unrelenting" emphasis on change in CBT was ineffective in treating women with Borderline Personality Disorder, who needed a more balanced approach that emphasized both validation of emotional experience and the development of skills to overcome self-defeating behaviors. She describes her overall therapeutic approach in this book, but largely emphasizes the skill-building portion of the treatment, which describes how to teach the following skills: mindfulness, emotional regulation, distress tolerance, and interpersonal effectiveness. I like her approach because it is very practical, but also very warm.
I'm constantly chasing people around the office with copies of this book in my arms, begging them to read it, so if you're interested in this sort of thing, I'd definitely recommend it.
(Note: I also read Suzanne Collins' Hunger Games and its sequel, Catching Fire. I'll review those when I've read the third one, Mockingjay, which will be coming out at the end of this month!)
3 comments:
Nice reviews... very enjoyable reading as always. I especially liked how you described Duncan's writing style as "charmingly verbose, over-the-top"... it made me chuckle. And it got me wondering... how would you describe your own writing style?
Mellifluous. ;)
Sweet... and just in case ya'll were wondering... that is a real word and I think it is a pretty apt description. :-)
It means:
1 : having a smooth rich flow
2 : filled with something (as honey) that sweetens
(Thank you Merriam-Webster online dictionary.)
Post a Comment